<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Challenge of Teaching Science Correctly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.montessoriforeveryone.com/challenge-of-teaching-science-correctly.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.montessoriforeveryone.com/challenge-of-teaching-science-correctly.html</link>
	<description>High Quality Montessori Materials</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:36:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori Bourne</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.montessoriforeveryone.com/challenge-of-teaching-science-correctly.html/comment-page-1#comment-2090</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori Bourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.montessoriforeveryone.com/?p=2331#comment-2090</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Lisa! I admit I am a work in progress when it comes to science. 

I realize when I re-read this post that I use &quot;science&quot; and &quot;physics&quot; sort of interchangeably; I think that&#039;s because we&#039;ve been working so much on physics stuff (the Geography Charts and the Forces work). 

Anyway, I know there is misinformation out there about other branches of science, but I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s as pervasive and widespread. Learning about botany and zoology doesn&#039;t really contradict what we see in our daily lives the way physics does. Still might make a good topic in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Lisa! I admit I am a work in progress when it comes to science. </p>
<p>I realize when I re-read this post that I use &#8220;science&#8221; and &#8220;physics&#8221; sort of interchangeably; I think that&#8217;s because we&#8217;ve been working so much on physics stuff (the Geography Charts and the Forces work). </p>
<p>Anyway, I know there is misinformation out there about other branches of science, but I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s as pervasive and widespread. Learning about botany and zoology doesn&#8217;t really contradict what we see in our daily lives the way physics does. Still might make a good topic in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.montessoriforeveryone.com/challenge-of-teaching-science-correctly.html/comment-page-1#comment-2089</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.montessoriforeveryone.com/?p=2331#comment-2089</guid>
		<description>Great post, Lori! I followed your link near the beginning of the post (&quot;textbooks contained errors&quot;) and read articles from CNN and Forbes about the problems with elementary and high school science text books - it is frightening that the textbook industry is driven by appearances, fun, and political correctness instead of accuracy. They just can&#039;t seem to get it together. It motivates me to continue to develop new materials that can be trusted, even if its just one little topic at a time. 

It&#039;s exciting that your eyes have been opened to the problems and challenges in science education and that you are working through misconceptions yourself. Good job, sis!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Lori! I followed your link near the beginning of the post (&#8220;textbooks contained errors&#8221;) and read articles from CNN and Forbes about the problems with elementary and high school science text books &#8211; it is frightening that the textbook industry is driven by appearances, fun, and political correctness instead of accuracy. They just can&#8217;t seem to get it together. It motivates me to continue to develop new materials that can be trusted, even if its just one little topic at a time. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s exciting that your eyes have been opened to the problems and challenges in science education and that you are working through misconceptions yourself. Good job, sis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

